Mindful Ramblings
WARNING! Includes spoilers.
Published on March 7, 2004 By Unfairman In Entertainment
Here I sit, 2 am on a Saturday, and I've just finished Stephen King's "Wolves of the Calla: The Dark Tower V". Here are my thoughts, in brief.

First off, great book. If you're not familiar with the Dark Tower series, you should be. It's Stephen King's greatest, most far-reaching work, encompassing (at least in part) half of his novels. It tells the story of Roland Deschain, las of the Gunslingers and his obsessive quest for the Dark Tower, the axiom on which the entire universe spins. The novels take place in a world that has strong ties to our own.

"Wolves" puts us back in touch with Roland and his "ka-tet": Jake Chambers, Eddie and Susannah Dean, Oy the Billy Bumbler and, of course Roland. They find themselves in the middle of a small town (Calla), where "Wolves" threaten to steal one of every set of twins in the countryside, as they have for 6 or 8 generations. Most of the children born in the Calla come in twos, the rule rather than the exception.

Enough plot outline, and on to the critique.

First of all, King is a genius and a hack. As far as his creativity goes, he is one of the wonders of the world, as anyone familiar with his work (and many, many of us are) can attest. His writing style, while above adequate, cannot compare to with many of the authors, published and not, of his era.

That said, the man can write plot to beat the band. What I love about much of his work, and "Wolves" raises the bar, is his ability to foreshadow. He'll flaunt the small details, practically flinging them in your face. His novels are filled with so many big surprises and coincidences that he can seamlessly interweave small ones. When the minor ones do show themselves, you nearly smack yourself in the head for not seeing it coming, because he distracts with you by making you try to comprehend the main plot twists.

His arrogance arises in "Wolves", as it does in much of his work. He constantly refers to his own work, even giving the characters copies of his own novels in the story. He puts his name in the novel on many occasions...it's like "Last Action Hero", but instead of being camply, like the film, he takes himself extremely seriously. I won't go into any more details.

In all, I feel "Wolves of the Calla" is a fine continuations in one of my most beloved series, if it do ya. And I say thankya.

Comments
on Mar 07, 2004
I am hooked on the Gunslinger series, but have to admit that I am glad to know that he has finally finished writing the whole series. After the first few books, I knew that I had to see it through, and would be terribly disappointed to not know the outcome of the story. A good writer? He draws you in and can keep you there. It's the better of his writing. (I have disliked a fair number of his books and for the first time in a long time, won't just read anything he puts out.) I liken this series to some of his other work (The Talisman, Black House, It, The Body, Hearts In Atlantis, The Stand, just to name a few) because he is very good at writing about hope, desire, and promise from something that you figure is going to end badly, because so much involved in the story is painful.

Just in case you didn't know, they pushed forward the release of the next Gunslinger book: it will come out this June instead of November.

Looking forward to that review.
on Mar 07, 2004
Aye Unfairman... on some accounts you speak true. and I say thankee-sai

on others, not so much...

i see you finally sobered up long enough to read something...

lol
on Mar 07, 2004
Who said I was sober when I was reading? Sheesh!!